every september, millions of parents try a kind of psychological witchcraft, to transform their summer-glazed campers into fall students, their video-bugs into bookworms. advice is cheap and all too familiar: clear a quiet work space. stick to a homework schedule. set goals. set boundaries. do not bribe (except in emergencies).
and check out the classroom. does junior’s learning style match the new teacher’s approach? or the school’s philosophy? maybe the child isn’t “a good fit” for the school.
such theories have developed in part because of sketchy education research that doesn’t offer clear guidance. student traits and teaching styles surely interact; so do personalities and at-home rules. the trouble is, no one can predict how.
yet there are effective approaches to learning, at least for those who are motivated. in recent years, cognitive scientists have shown that a few simple techniques can reliably improve what matters most: how much a student learns from studying.
the findings can help anyone, from a fourth grader doing long division to a retiree taking on a new language. but they directly contradict much of the common wisdom about good study habits, and they have not caught on.
continue reading the main story
for instance, instead of sticking to one study location, simply alternating the room where a person studies improves retention. so does studying distinct but related skills or concepts in one sitting, rather than focusing intensely on a single thing.
“we have known these principles for some time, and it’s intriguing that schools don’t pick them up, or that people don’t learn them by trial and error,” said robert a. bjork, a psychologist at the university of california, los angeles. “instead, we walk around with all sorts of unexamined beliefs about what works that are mistaken.”
take the notion that children have specific learning styles, that some are “visual learners” and others are auditory; some are “left-brain” students, others “right-brain.” in a recent review of the relevant research, published in the journal psychological science in the public interest, a team of psychologists found almost zero support for such ideas. “the contrast between the enormous popularity of the learning-styles approach within education and the lack of credible evidence for its utility is, in our opinion, striking and disturbing,” the researchers concluded.
ditto for teaching styles, researchers say. some excellent instructors caper in front of the blackboard like summer-theater falstaffs; others are reserved to the point of shyness. “we have yet to identify the common threads between teachers who create a constructive learning atmosphere,” said daniel t. willingham, a psychologist at the university of virginia and author of the book “why don’t students like school? ”
but individual learning is another matter, and psychologists have discovered that some of the most hallowed advice on study habits is flat wrong. for instance, many study skills courses insist that students find a specific place, a study room or a quiet corner of the library, to take their work. the research finds just the opposite. in one classic 1978 experiment, psychologists found that college students who studied a list of 40 vocabulary words in two different rooms — one windowless and cluttered, the other modern, with a view on a courtyard — did far better on a test than students who studied the words twice, in the same room. later studies have confirmed the finding, for a variety of topics.
the brain makes subtle associations between what it is studying and the background sensations it has at the time, the authors say, regardless of whether those perceptions are conscious. it colors the terms of the versailles treaty with the wasted fluorescent glow of the dorm study room, say; or the elements of the marshall plan with the jade-curtain shade of the willow tree in the backyard. forcing the brain to make multiple associations with the same material may, in effect, give that information more neural scaffolding.
“what we think is happening here is that, when the outside context is varied, the information is enriched, and this slows down forgetting,” said dr. bjork, the senior author of the two-room experiment.
varying the type of material studied in a single sitting — alternating, for example, among vocabulary, reading and speaking in a new language — seems to leave a deeper impression on the brain than does concentrating on just one skill at a time. musicians have known this for years, and their practice sessions often include a mix of scales, musical pieces and rhythmic work. many athletes, too, routinely mix their workouts with strength, speed and skill drills.
she's is dead because she is depress
maybe? uhmmm i think so